2025-12-11
DEVELOPMENT 3: The Bel-Air Massacre and State Absence
CONFIDENCE
High Confidence. Multiple international news agencies including ABC News, the Washington Post, and the
Council on Foreign Relations have confirmed the ongoing violence in Bel-Air beginning December 8.
Death toll reporting ranges from 49 to over 60, with specific casualties confirmed including 10 child
recruits, 19 women executed, and high-profile gang leaders. The violence is now in its fourth consecutive
day with no reported police intervention.
What's Happening
The Krache Dife gang, a splinter group from the Viv Ansanm coalition, launched a territorial assault in Bel-Air on
December 8 targeting rival gang leaders. The attack has resulted in over 60 confirmed deaths including 10
children who were gang recruits, 19 women executed during the violence, and at least 19 gang members.
High-profile casualties include Dede, a gang leader who was beheaded, and Kempes Sanon, another prominent
gang figure who was wounded. The violence has entered its fourth day as of Thursday December 11. The Haitian
National Police has not deployed units to stop the fighting or restore order in the neighborhood. International
media report no evidence of PNH presence in the affected area. The violence represents an internal power
struggle within the Viv Ansanm gang federation.
Why This Matters
Thursday, December 11, 2025, 7:00 PM Haiti Time
The PNH non-intervention signals a strategic decision to allow gang self-purging rather than risk officer casualties
in gang-versus-gang conflicts. This represents a fundamental shift in security doctrine where the state accepts
extreme violence in gang-controlled territories as long as it does not threaten government institutions or
commercial zones. The four-day duration without intervention demonstrates this is deliberate policy, not
operational incapacity. The death toll now exceeds the October Pont-Sonde massacre that triggered international
condemnation. The normalization of multi-day urban warfare in the capital creates expectations that similar
violence will be tolerated in future gang territorial disputes. For international partners including the GSF, this raises
questions about rules of engagement and whether the mission will intervene in gang-on-gang violence or limit
itself to protecting government functions.