2026-02-28
DEVELOPMENT 2: ELECTORAL FEASIBILITY CRISIS: EXPERT ANALYSIS CONTRADICTS
OFFICIAL POSTURE
A France24 analysis published February 28, 2026, consolidated assessments from three
independent academic experts that collectively challenge the viability of Haiti's electoral calendar.
Alex Dupuy of Wesleyan University assessed that the Haitian National Police lack the firepower and
resources for military-scale operations, and characterized the Kenyan-led multinational mission as
having achieved limited pacification with personnel who lack Haitian context and language capacity.
Eduardo Gamarra of Florida International University identified the absence of a trustworthy
electoral registry, a non-operational political party system, and no genuine organizational capability
to conduct a vote. Gamarra also identified a growing sense of donor fatigue toward Haiti among
contributing governments.
This expert consensus stands in direct contradiction with official public postures. PM Alix
Didier Fils-Aime stated on February 26 that he is confident elections will be held by
year-end. Secretary Rubio, at the CARICOM meeting, endorsed progress on the anti-gang
force. Neither statement engaged the structural prerequisites that experts identify as absent.
The gap between official confidence and expert assessment is not a matter of interpretation;
it reflects the difference between political messaging and operational ground conditions.
February 28, 2026
The Provisional Electoral Council has itself acknowledged that twenty-three communes
remain under gang control and that security is a prerequisite for the August 30 target vote
date. This internal CEP acknowledgment aligns with the expert critique rather than with PM
Fils-Aime's public confidence. The National Pact's Article 12, which envisions constitutional
modifications through an electoral mechanism the CEP considers outside its legal authority,
adds a procedural dimension to the operational and security concerns already documented.
Gamarra identified two structural pathways: sustained military action sufficient to dismantle gang
territorial control, or negotiated political integration of armed faction leadership. Neither pathway has
a defined timeline consistent with an August 30 vote. The France24 analysis noted that the National
Pact does not specify a clear timeline for the Prime Minister's departure, leaving the end-state of
the current governance arrangement formally undefined.