EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The CEP's revised electoral calendar first round July 18, 2027, second round October 4, 2027 now
represents the only live institutional framework for ending Haiti's six-year democratic deficit, but three
compounding fault lines threaten its credibility before a single ballot is cast. Gang forces estimated to
control up to 90 percent of Port-au-Prince continue to block registration infrastructure in the Ouest
department, the country's largest electoral district. The unresolved eligibility question surrounding
Michel Martelly, who registered October 16 under the eleven-party Debloke coalition, confronts the
CEP with a choice between procedural accommodation and international legitimacy. And with 105
registered political groups and no dominant force, the legislative field guarantees post-election
coalition instability regardless of outcome. The single actionable insight: missions should treat
candidate validation, not the first-round date, as the earliest decisive test of CEP institutional
independence.
QUICK SUMMARY FOR STAKEHOLDERS
One. The CEP's revised calendar sets July 18, 2027 as the presidential and legislative first round and
October 4, 2027 as the second round with local elections; registration for presidential, senate, and
deputy candidates remains open until November 15, 2026, and for mayoral, CASEC, and ASEC
candidates until November 30, 2026.
Two. Michel Martelly, whose sanctions status is actively contested internationally, registered as a
presidential candidate October 16 under the Debloke coalition; the CEP has not publicly ruled on his
eligibility.
Three. The Viktwa coalition, claiming fifty-two affiliated parties, launched in Cap-Haïtien on August 29,
signaling a northern expansion strategy worth tracking in down-ballot races.
Four. Key figure to watch: PM Alix Didier Fils-Aimé, who holds executive authority following the
February 7 CPT dissolution and whose cabinet decree barring state resources for electoral purposes
remains unverified in implementation per the UN envoy.
Five. The central risk to the vote occurring on schedule is the inability of security forces Haitian police,
the Gang Suppression Force, and the 2,000-plus Salvadoran troops deployed before October 29 to
open gang-controlled zones in Ouest and expanding areas of Artibonite and Centre to electoral
operations.
DEVELOPMENT BLOCKS
DEVELOPMENT 1: ELECTORAL CALENDAR, CEP AND FEASIBILITY
Haiti's electoral calendar has undergone at least three major revisions in 2026. The original first-round
date of August 30, 2026 was abandoned without a public decree of postponement, followed by a
revised calendar published on the CEP's official site setting December 13, 2026 as the first round,
November 01, 2026
with a second round on February 21, 2027 and final results on March 7. That calendar was itself
superseded by the decree of October 6, 2026, which formally annulled the June 2 and July 2 decrees
and established the current schedule: first round July 18, 2027, second round October 4, 2027, and
final results October 23, 2027. The CEP described the revised timeline as the product of consultations
with security forces, political actors, civil society, the private sector, and government, according to Le
National and the CEP's official communications. France24 and RFI both corroborated the October 6
decree on October 29.
The scope of this electoral cycle, as reflected in the CEP registration dashboard, encompasses all
thirty Senate seats three per each of Haiti's ten departments and all 119 seats of the Chamber of
Deputies, alongside the presidential race and local elections in the second round. The constitutional
referendum on unspecified amendments is bundled with the July 18 first round, adding significant
political complexity that the available sources have not yet fully detailed. Candidate registration for
presidential, senate, and deputy offices remains open until November 15, 2026, and for mayoral,
CASEC, and ASEC offices until November 30, 2026, per the CEP registration dashboard. As of
October 31, the CEP had received registrations from sixteen declared presidential candidates and
balloted 105 political groups.
Security conditions remain the binding constraint on feasibility. Gang forces control an estimated 90
percent of Port-au-Prince as of late October 2026, per the Rio Times and corroborating assessments.
The UN human rights chief Volker Türk reported at least 5,700 killed or wounded in 2026 through early
October, and more than 1,000 women and girls raped, according to GenocideWatch citing UN
sources. Several municipalities under gang control lack functional registration centers. The Ouest
department containing Port-au-Prince and the largest concentration of eligible voters was initially
excluded from the July 20 voter registration launch due to security conditions and was only
incorporated beginning July 30 after a CEP security assessment, per Le Nouvelliste. Gang expansion
into Artibonite and Centre departments has been flagged as a regional escalation risk by Rezo
Nòdwès and Rio Times coverage.
More than 2,000 Salvadoran troops deployed alongside Haitian police and the Gang Suppression
Force prior to October 29, according to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette and Rio Times. AP
documented armored vehicle patrols near the airport on October 20. Their operational mandate, rules
of engagement, and command architecture remain opaque in publicly available sources. Whether this
security architecture can open sufficient territory for credible nationwide electoral operations by July
2027 is, in AYITI INTEL's assessment, the single most consequential unanswered operational
question for the current cycle. The voter registration period closed October 13; the CEP has not yet
published final registration totals. Approximately 6 million Haitians of voting age are estimated to hold
the Carte d'Identification Nationale required for registration, per electoral registration analysis
reviewed by AYITI INTEL, but the additional CEP electoral roll registration step a departure from the
2021 plan to use the ONI database directly has drawn criticism from observers who argue it
increases barriers and exclusion risk, particularly in insecure areas, as noted in Haiti Policy House
documentation. Diaspora voting procedures remain unresolved, with no confirmed framework as of
the date of this brief.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
November 01, 2026
The 2015 electoral cycle produced a contested first round on October 25, 2015, followed by fraud
allegations, mass protest, postponement, and a re-run an annulment-and-restart cycle that
consumed more than a year and produced a legitimately disputed transfer of power when Jovenel
Moïse eventually prevailed in 2017. That precedent establishes that a contested first round under thin
observation is more likely to produce prolonged litigation than a settled outcome. More broadly, the
pattern of executive decree rule in the absence of a legislature first established when parliament
dissolved in January 2015 and Martelly governed by decree has been repeated through the
2020-to-2026 transition, with PM Fils-Aimé now exercising executive authority without a seated
legislature, carrying the same legitimacy deficit.
TALKING POINTS
One. The July 18, 2027 first-round date derives from the CEP decree of October 6, 2026, not from
earlier decrees, and represents the third calendar revision of the year; each prior revision failed
against security realities.
Two. Gang control of up to 90 percent of Port-au-Prince, combined with the Ouest department's late
entry into voter registration, means that the country's largest electoral constituency remains
structurally underregistered and operationally at risk.
Three. The bundled constitutional referendum on July 18 introduces a second high-stakes vote whose
specific content has not been publicly detailed; it will complicate observation mandates and may
generate additional political conflict.
Four. Voter registration infrastructure requiring both a valid CIN and a separate CEP roll registration
creates a two-step barrier that critics argue diverges from the original 2021 ONI-integration plan and
disproportionately excludes insecure and displaced populations.
Five. International consensus CARICOM, OAS, UN formally endorses the July 2027 timeline but has
flagged credibility gaps, particularly on the implementation of the October 5 cabinet decree barring
state resources for electoral use.
Six. The Salvadoran military deployment introduces a new security variable whose operational scope,
command structure, and effectiveness in opening gang-held territory for electoral operations is not yet
publicly verifiable.
RECOMMENDED DECISIONS
One. Missions should formally engage the CEP to request publication of final voter registration totals
and a departmental breakdown, using the data gap as a credibility benchmark.
Two. Election support programming should be contingency-planned for at least one further
postponement; field deployment postures in Ouest, Artibonite, and Centre departments should remain
flexible.
Three. Observers and diplomats should seek a technical briefing from the Salvadoran military
November 01, 2026
command or the Haitian government on the operational mandate and rules of engagement of the
2,000-plus Salvadoran troops.
Four. Missions should formally request CEP clarification on the specific constitutional amendments
bundled into the July 18 first round before those amendments become a campaign flashpoint.
Five. International observer delegations should build the bundled referendum into observation
mandates and secure additional legal and political expertise before field deployment.
Six. Missions should flag the diaspora voting mechanism as a time-sensitive credibility requirement
and press for a CEP framework no later than the first quarter of 2027.
CONFIDENCE
Moderate confidence based on partial institutional reporting.
DEVELOPMENT 2: PRESIDENTIAL CONTENDERS AND COALITIONS
Sixteen declared presidential candidates had registered with the CEP as of October 31, 2026,
according to Haiti Policy House, the Haitian Times, and CEP official communications. The CEP
published a provisional list of nine candidates on September 24, per franceinfo, which expanded
thereafter. The highest-profile and most contested figure in the field is Michel Martelly, former
president of Haiti (2011-2016), who returned to Haiti on July 15 after years abroad and registered
online on October 16 under the Debloke coalition, a vehicle aggregating eleven parties, according to
Instagram posts from his registration and Rezo Nòdwès reporting. Martelly is the sixteenth declared
presidential candidate. His candidacy is the single highest-stakes eligibility question before the CEP:
Canada has explicitly warned against the participation of sanctioned personalities, per Rezo Nòdwès,
and RFI on August 6 framed the operative question as whether elections proceed with or without
sanctioned candidates. The CEP's electoral decree does not appear to include an explicit
sanctions-based disqualification mechanism, creating a direct gap between international norms and
CEP procedure. The Haiti Policy House tracker notes no confirmed sanctions findings against the full
listed candidate pool in its reviewed sources, but flags Martelly's status as actively contested
internationally.
Beyond Martelly, the declared field includes Claude Joseph, former acting prime minister, running
under the EDE party; Gary Bodeau under the Rekonsilye Group; Wilson Jeudy under
Vision-Action-Realization; Gandhy Dorfeuille under Ansanm Nou Fò; Daniest Adrien under PRC; Deus
Deronneth under DVNH; Ricardo Jean-Pierre under the Nationalist Party; Wilner Joseph representing
the Viktwa Group; Joseph Maxo under Awakening of Citizens; Munir Joseph Moura under Mobilization
for Progress; and Moïse Durocher under Sol Ayiti, among others identified by Haiti Policy House and
Prensa Latina as of September 30. Claude Joseph is the most institutionally credible figure outside
Martelly in terms of international name recognition, having served as acting prime minister during the
period following Jovenel Moïse's assassination in July 2021. No other candidate in the field carries
equivalent executive experience in publicly available sourcing.
November 01, 2026
The coalition architecture of the race reflects extreme fragmentation. The 105 political groups holding
ballot numbers per CEP official site and YouTube footage of the ballot number drawing represent a
field in which no single formation is positioned to dominate without extensive post-first-round alliance
building. The Viktwa platform, which claims affiliation with 52 parties or structures, held a launch event
in Cap-Haïtien on August 29, per Instagram documentation, signaling a deliberate northern expansion
strategy. Debloke, Martelly's vehicle, aggregates 11 parties. AYITI INTEL assesses the Viktwa
coalition's claim of 52 affiliates as warranting scrutiny: coalition fragmentation at this scale historically
reflects opportunistic aggregation rather than programmatic unity, and the platform's capacity to
translate aggregated party structures into actual votes across departments has not been tested. No
polling data disaggregated by candidate is available in reviewed sources; the field is too fragmented
and the security environment too restrictive for meaningful public polling to have been conducted.
The candidate validation process in which the CEP will review declared candidacies against eligibility
criteria including age, residency, political rights status, and potentially sanctions has not been publicly
scheduled but is expected within weeks of the November 15 registration close for presidential, senate,
and deputy candidates. The CEP's ruling on Martelly and other contested figures is, in AYITI INTEL's
assessment, the single highest-stakes near-term institutional decision of the electoral cycle: a
decision to validate Martelly risks antagonizing Canada and potentially the United States, while a
decision to disqualify him on sanctions grounds without a clear legal mechanism in the decree risks a
legal challenge and accusations of political manipulation.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
The 2015 fraud cycle in which a contested first round under the CEP produced allegations of
systematic vote padding for Jovenel Moïse, leading to mass protest, a verification commission, and
eventual annulment of results is the direct precedent for what can occur when candidate legitimacy
disputes are not resolved before the first round. The template of a hand-picked or institutionally
captured electoral council validating controversial candidates, first established during the Martelly
decree-rule period of 2015-2016, is precisely the legitimacy deficit that international partners are
attempting to pre-empt through warnings on sanctioned candidates.
TALKING POINTS
One. Sixteen declared presidential candidates have registered as of October 31; the field is highly
fragmented with 105 political groups holding ballot numbers and no dominant force in available
sourcing.
Two. Michel Martelly's registration under the eleven-party Debloke coalition on October 16 is the most
significant candidacy development of the cycle; his eligibility remains unresolved and the electoral
decree lacks an explicit sanctions-disqualification mechanism.
Three. Claude Joseph, former acting prime minister, is the most institutionally experienced declared
non-Martelly candidate identified in reviewed sources; his coalition base and departmental
organization have not been detailed in available reporting.
Four. The Viktwa coalition's claim of 52 affiliates merits analytical caution; aggregated coalition
November 01, 2026
structures of this size in prior Haitian cycles have not translated reliably into proportional legislative or
presidential vote shares.
Five. Diaspora mobilization around the Martelly candidacy is expected to be polarizing within diaspora
political networks in the United States, Canada, and France; missions in those jurisdictions should
anticipate organized advocacy both for and against his eligibility.
RECOMMENDED DECISIONS
One. Missions should formally and collectively communicate to the CEP the expectation that
candidate eligibility rulings be published with transparent legal reasoning, particularly regarding the
sanctions question.
Two. Diplomats should engage Claude Joseph, Gary Bodeau, and other declared non-Martelly
candidates with institutional profiles to assess coalition-building intentions and platform coherence
before the campaign period opens.
Three. Journalists and observers should seek direct confirmation from the CEP of the legal basis
specific decree articles on which it will evaluate sanctions-related eligibility, and report any gap
publicly.
Four. Missions covering diaspora communities in the United States, Canada, and France should brief
their political affairs sections on the Martelly candidacy polarization dynamic ahead of anticipated
mobilization.
Five. Investors and businesses should treat the outcome of the candidate validation process as a
leading indicator of CEP institutional independence and weight post-election policy predictability
accordingly.
Six. Researchers should begin mapping the Debloke and Viktwa coalition memberships against
legislative candidate registrations to assess whether presidential coalition structures translate into
down-ballot organizational presence.
CONFIDENCE
Moderate confidence based on partial institutional reporting.
DEVELOPMENT 3: DOWN-BALLOT, MAIN-CITY RACES AND POWER-BROKERS
Legislative and local candidate registration remains open for senate and deputy candidates until
November 15, 2026, and for mayoral, CASEC, and ASEC candidates until November 30, 2026, per
the CEP registration dashboard. The full scope of the legislative election encompasses all thirty
Senate seats, with three seats per department across Haiti's ten departments, and all 119 seats of
the Chamber of Deputies. No functioning parliament has sat since January 2020, meaning that the
incoming legislature will inherit six years of legislative backlog, unratified treaties, and unconfirmed
November 01, 2026
appointments. The institutional deficit is so severe that legislative candidates across all departments
face constituency service gaps that are effectively impossible to explain or campaign around in a
normal political framework.
In the Senate races, the most internationally notable previously sanctioned figure with legislative
history is Joseph Lambert, former Senate president, who is on both U.S. OFAC and Canadian
sanctions lists for alleged drug trafficking and gang enablement, per Treasury press release JY1137
and Canada.ca sanctions documentation. Lambert's inclusion on those lists as of 2022, and the
updating of the OFAC SDN list as recently as October 15, 2026, makes him a potential test case for
the sanctions-eligibility question at the legislative level if he or allied candidates seek registration. Youri
Latortue, also on U.S. OFAC and Canadian sanctions lists for similar allegations, is another figure
whose political network in the Artibonite department historically among the most electorally
competitive merits tracking. AYITI INTEL notes that allegations of drug trafficking and gang
enablement against Lambert and Latortue derive from U.S. and Canadian sanctions designations and
are not established in a Haitian judicial proceeding; they are reported here as allegations attributed to
those governments.
Fednel Monchery, listed on the U.S. OFAC Specially Designated Nationals list under GLOMAG
(Global Magnitsky) designations with date of birth August 25, 1963, from Anse-à-Veau, is identified in
OFAC documentation reviewed by AYITI INTEL. Anse-à-Veau is in the Nippes department. His
presence on the SDN list represents another potential eligibility flashpoint in down-ballot races if his
name or affiliated networks appear in registration filings.
In main-city mayoral races, no specific declared candidacies for Port-au-Prince, Cap-Haïtien,
Gonaïves, Les Cayes, Jacmel, Jérémie, Port-de-Paix, Fort-Liberté, Hinche, or Miragoâne have been
confirmed in reviewed sources as of October 31. The Cap-Haïtien area is a focus of activity: the
Viktwa coalition's August 29 launch event in Cap-Haïtien, per Instagram documentation, signals an
organizational presence that is likely to translate into senate, deputy, and mayoral candidacies in the
North department. Port-au-Prince's mayoral race carries the highest political and security stakes,
given that gang control of up to 90 percent of the city makes door-to-door campaigning, voter
registration, and election-day operations in most of the metropolitan area functionally impossible
under current conditions.
Among non-candidate power-brokers shaping the field, PM Alix Didier Fils-Aimé holds the most
structurally consequential position: his cabinet controls state resources, his October 5 decree
nominally bars their electoral use, and his public commitment on September 26 that the transition will
end through elections, per Anadolu Agency establishes his political stake in the July 2027 outcome.
The UN envoy's October 19 Security Council briefing flagged that implementation of the
state-resources decree remains unverified in practice, a critical observation for missions monitoring
incumbency advantage. Laurent Saint-Cyr, former CPT president, whose opposition to the January
21, 2026 motion to dismiss Fils-Aimé was decisive in preserving the current executive arrangement
per Wikipedia CPT sourcing, is a structural power-broker even without a declared candidacy. The
private sector, whose role in financing and sustaining the transitional period is documented in
CARICOM statements, represents a bloc of financial power-brokers that will shape coalition-building
irrespective of ballot positions.
November 01, 2026
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
The Artibonite department's centrality to Haitian electoral violence is longstanding: the 2004 Gonaïves
offensive, in which the Cannibal Army under Buteur Métayer seized the city and triggered the political
collapse that ended Aristide's second term, established Artibonite as the department where armed
actors most directly translate territorial control into political outcomes. Current gang expansion into
Artibonite documented by Rezo Nòdwès and Rio Times is therefore not merely a security issue; it is a
direct threat to the electoral integrity of a department whose senate and deputy races historically
attract competitive, high-stakes candidates.
TALKING POINTS
One. All thirty Senate seats and all 119 Chamber of Deputies seats are at stake in this cycle; no
functioning parliament has sat since January 2020, making this the most consequential legislative
election in Haiti in at least a decade.
Two. Joseph Lambert and Youri Latortue both on U.S. OFAC and Canadian sanctions lists for
allegations of drug trafficking and gang enablement and Fednel Monchery on the OFAC SDN list
represent the most prominent individually documented down-ballot eligibility risks; their political
networks in Artibonite and Nippes departments merit tracking.
Three. The Viktwa coalition's Cap-Haïtien launch signals organizational intent in the North department
that likely extends below the presidential ticket to senate, deputy, and mayoral races; its 52-party claim
remains analytically unverified.
Four. Port-au-Prince's mayoral race is structurally the highest-stakes local contest but the least
operationally viable under current gang control; no declared candidacies have been confirmed in
reviewed sources.
Five. PM Fils-Aimé's position as executive authority holder makes him the most consequential
non-candidate power-broker; the unverified implementation of his October 5 state-resources decree is
a leading indicator of incumbency advantage risk.
RECOMMENDED DECISIONS
One. Observer missions should establish a legislative candidate tracking system immediately,
mapping registered senate and deputy candidates against sanctions lists and flagging CEP eligibility
rulings as they are issued.
Two. Journalists should pursue direct confirmation from the CEP of whether Lambert, Latortue,
Monchery, or their known affiliates have registered for legislative or local races, and report the CEP's
legal reasoning on their eligibility.
Three. Missions in Port-au-Prince should assess operational feasibility of mayoral race campaigning in
gang-controlled neighborhoods and communicate findings to CEP and security partners as part of
electoral planning.
November 01, 2026
Four. Researchers tracking the Artibonite department should integrate gang territorial mapping with
legislative candidate registration data to assess the scope of armed-actor influence on the down-ballot
field.
Five. Missions monitoring the private sector's role should request that the UN envoy provide the
Security Council with specific indicators of state-resources decree compliance in the next BINUH
briefing cycle.
Six. Observers covering Cap-Haïtien should attend Viktwa coalition events and file candidate
registration data as it becomes available to assess whether the 52-party claim translates into actual
down-ballot candidacies across the North and Northeast departments.
CONFIDENCE
Low confidence due to limited or conflicting reporting.
NEXT 24 TO 48 HOURS
Monitor the CEP's official site at cephaiti.ht and its official social channels for any interim
announcements on candidate registration totals, eligibility rulings, or revisions to the registration
dashboard. Watch for any public statement from the CEP on the Martelly registration or on
sanctions-based eligibility criteria any such statement in this window would represent an acceleration
of the validation timeline and should be treated as a priority signal. Monitor Canadian diplomatic
communications for any formal follow-up to the public warning against sanctioned candidate
participation; a bilateral communiqué or expanded sanctions designation in this window would
represent a significant escalation of international pressure. Watch Rezo Nòdwès, Le Nouvelliste, and
Radio Kiskeya for any street-level security incidents in Port-au-Prince that might affect registration
center operations or CEP facility access in the final days of the registration window.
THIS WEEK
Track registration milestones: the November 15 deadline for presidential, senate, and deputy
candidates is the primary near-term institutional gate. Any CEP announcement of the provisional or
definitive list of validated candidates, including eligibility rulings, should be treated as the single most
important electoral intelligence product of the coming weeks. Monitor coalition talks: the
post-registration period will likely see intensified alliance negotiations between declared presidential
candidates and legislative coalition structures, particularly around the Viktwa and Debloke platforms.
Watch for any Salvadoran military command or Haitian government statement on the operational
mandate of the 2,000-plus deployed troops, as this will affect operational planning for election support
programming. Monitor OCHA displacement reports and MSF or NGO security advisories for any
escalation in Artibonite and Centre departments that would threaten the geographic scope of the
electoral calendar.
STRATEGIC HORIZON
November 01, 2026
The realistic path to a credible vote on July 18, 2027 requires four conditions to be met in sequence.
First, the CEP must issue defensible candidate eligibility rulings particularly on sanctioned figures
that command sufficient international legitimacy to sustain international financial and technical
support for the electoral process. Second, the security architecture of Haitian police, the Gang
Suppression Force, and Salvadoran troops must demonstrably open sufficient territory in Ouest,
Artibonite, and Centre departments to permit campaign operations, voter registration center access,
and election-day logistics by the second quarter of 2027. Third, the constitutional referendum bundled
into the July 18 first round must be politically managed in a way that does not generate a separate
protest mobilization capable of derailing the presidential and legislative votes. Fourth, the diaspora
voting mechanism must be resolved before the campaign period in a manner that either provides a
credible participation framework or is publicly acknowledged as deferred. If any of these conditions
fails, the most likely scenario consistent with the 2015 precedent is a contested or postponed first
round producing prolonged results litigation rather than a settled transfer of power. AYITI INTEL
assesses the probability of all four conditions being met as low to moderate given current security and
institutional trajectories. The collapse of three prior calendar targets in 2026 establishes the baseline
for that assessment.
PRIMARY SOURCES
One. Le National multiple articles on CEP calendar revisions, decrees of June 2, July 2, and October
6, 2026; original August 30 first-round date reporting.
Six. CEP official site (cephaiti.ht) registration dashboard, approved political groupements list, ballot
number drawing, revised calendar of October 28, 2026.
Ten. France24 October 29, 2026 corroboration of CEP decree and revised calendar; security
conditions reporting.
Two. Le Nouvelliste voter registration launch coverage, July 20, 2026; Ouest department exclusion
and July 30 inclusion; CEP Registration and Voting Center operations.
Fourteen. UN Transcripts ECOSOC CARICOM statement; UN Security Council transcript 10246
(October 19, 2026 BINUH briefing); used for international positioning and UN envoy flagging.
Eleven. RFI October 29, 2026 calendar corroboration; August 6, 2026 sanctions-candidate eligibility
framing; used as secondary international corroboration.
Three. Rezo Nòdwès Canada warning against sanctioned candidate participation; gang security
coverage; sovereignty counter-narrative editorials; gang expansion in Artibonite and Centre.
Four. AlterPresse transitional governance and CPT dissolution context; cited in coalition and political
governance reporting.
Five. Haiti Policy House Election Tracker candidate field documentation, registration status, diaspora
voting mechanism status, sanctions findings review; analyst review date 2026-11-01.
Seven. Haitian Times party and coalition registration coverage, March 3, 2026; provisional candidate
list coverage, September 23, 2026.
Eight. Radio Kiskeya security and political governance monitoring; cited in regional security and
transition authority reporting.
Nine. Gazette Haïti transitional government and electoral decree coverage; cited in political
governance sourcing.
November 01, 2026